Ok that oughta get people's attention.
So I was reading **
here**, on a serendipitous tangent from a googlesearch... Seems to be part of a site to encourage students' critical thinking about propaganda, specifically Nazi ones. And I found this very 'pretty' greeting that was part of a 'Christmas' booklet:

I will post their translation, as it's surely more accurate than I could attempt:
"This page has a quotation from Adolf Hitler, which hardly seems consistent with the standard Christmas story:
All nature is a gigantic struggle between strength and weakness, an eternal victory of the strong over the weak.
—Adolf Hitler"
And the translator person has a point with that comment. Unless you consider (outside of temporary appearances) God as the ultimate "Strong" and all forces of evil as "Weak" in comparison. But somehow I don't think that's what Hitler was going for with that quote.
So I was thinking... I donno... about the war and stuff. I mean this one, now. And Saddam being executed the other day... OK he was really evil. He did stuff to his own people that was at least a serious imitation of the sorts of things Hitler and Stalin did. So yeah, he needed to be gone. But... all the rest of it, I don't know. It still, at gut-level, seems just as wrong as it did on Sept. 12, 2001 or whenever it was that we knew this was going to start. Well, actually, knowing now how 'well' it has worked, no... It seems even more wrong. And I'm not going to say it's ALL about oil. Although things are always more complicated than people let on; I think that's a given in politics. I'm just saying my gut feeling here, is the same as it has always been.
When I think about the Nazis, though, and about the Jews, and how almost nobody understood/believed what was happening in the Camps until after... Would I have been a pacifist in WWII? Would that have been wrong? I'm not exactly a pacifist, though. I think some wars are necessary. But I have no conclusive theory of how to tell which ones. So does that mean I shouldn't even talk about this stuff? Oh well, not for nothing does this blog have a readership of like 3 people.
And the other thing is... the strong and the weak. We are supposed to protect the "weak" whether that means people physically or mentally "damaged" (and who isn't or won't be, if you look deep enough or wait long enough?!) or people with stricter compunctions against certain things (as in the "brother with the weaker conscience" that we are instructed not to try to make him do stuff he believes is wrong). God is not only Strong compared to all that is evil, He is also Strong compared to all of us, and our strength is supposed to be from Him, not from our own abilities. Maybe this is part of the problem about what my friends that are disability activists call "able-ism". I didn't get where I am (for example, having a decent job) because of my abilities, I got where I am by Providence (though abilities are part of Providence). A person could be just as good or better at their field and get nowhere, if that was the "lot they were given" for lack of a better phrase at the moment. And just as the trials of the Israelites often happened through the sins of their neighbors, someone's life may be made more difficult by the intolerance of others, and they may not get to where they wanted to, or it may take a lot more effort. This may be an opportunity for them to learn something, maybe an opportunity for them to fight against injustice. The people acting with injustice against them are still wrong. And if a person has strength, it's not because they are better than another person. I mean, yeah, we are supposed to be brave and stuff. But what reaction takes how much strength is so relative to the person and even the moment.
OK, maybe I am also thinking of the movie we saw the other day. Gabriel has been strange, kinda shutdown, for some days (finally coming out of it, lately) and I asked would he like to go to a movie and which one, and he picked ROCKY BALBOA. [Groans from this woman, who thought, Oh no a boxing movie full of blood, sweat, lost braincells and broken noses. Anything but this.] But there was nothing else that looked promising, so we went.
Really. Nice. Movie. Appropriately titled with the guy's name, this is a not-terribly-deep but very nice movie, about Rocky the person, a decent sort of socially inappropriate (though charming) gentleman to women, teenagers of various races, poor people and (possibly illegal) immigrants... This is practically a chick-flick until the old boxer (with his oddly-assorted new entourage) starts training for the actual fight, and by then you are already totally attached to the characters and you don't mind all the ugh ugh grunt grunt macho stuff.
Anyway. The quote I remember is, like I said about the whole movie, not terribly deep, but it's been turning itself over in my head all this time. At some point, Rocky is talking to his son (maybe some kind of junior accountant, maybe just a bit geeky, so... on the surface the opposite of him) about life. And he says this:
"It doesn't matter how hard you can hit, but how hard you can get hit and keep moving forward."
Which on the surface is a really basic (and catchy) kind of underdog pep-talk, a kind of rallying-cry for the one who isn't expected to win. And it sounds like it would be a great slogan for the disability rights people, too, right? And you want to think, YEAH! I'm gonna try that. I'm gonna be strong against whatever gets thrown at me.
Except, wait. Because I also have **this song** flopping around in my head. And I know in my gut that this is also true. That Strength is not always --to borrow a word I have learned in a similar context lately-- volitional. And you can think of any struggle. Were the victims of any genocide who "let themselves be killed" any less brave than those who "tried to fight back"? Not Necessarily. Does Might make Right? Obviously, No. Are the 'weak' (however you define that) less deserving of help? It's precisely them (us) that need help. And does the strength that God gives people for getting through stuff always look like strength? Maybe Not.
So, again, quotes that sound like they make perfect sense at first, are producing more questions than answers...
[edited for clarity... I hope.]